SGCI News
Equitable research partnerships lead to better outcomes. By: Gilbert Nakweya [NAIROBI] African scientists are often undervalued and marginalized in collaborative research projects, leading to flawed research questions and biased interpretation of…
Equitable research partnerships lead to better outcomes.
By: Gilbert Nakweya
[NAIROBI] African scientists are often undervalued and marginalized in collaborative research projects, leading to flawed research questions and biased interpretation of data, academic leaders told a panel discussion.
Speaking during a webinar on fair and inclusive partnerships organised by the Southern African Research and Innovation Management Association (SARIMA) on 3 May, they highlighted the power imbalance in research partnerships between scientists in Africa and their counterparts in higher income countries.
SARIMA, a member organisation of research and innovation managers, helps strengthen the capacities of research management for science granting councils in Africa.
“Research grant calls are developed by people in funding agencies in the global North,” says Lyn Horn, director of the office of research integrity, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
“Collaborations and consortia are developed in response to those grant calls and researchers in the global South are merely added because the call requires this.”
She said inequity and unfairness in research partnerships between Africans and their counterparts in higher income countries undermine research integrity.
“Inequity and lack of fairness in research partnerships is a holdup to research integrity,” said Horn.
![](https://sgciafrica.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Rennie-Munyayi-manager-of-postgraduate-development-at-Namibia-University-of-Science-and-Technology-1-1024x628.png)
Research integrity relies on honesty and transparency throughout the entire research process and this requires adequate resources, including financial, human, systems, and infrastructure support, she explained.
“If funding requirements and processes don’t account for the lack of human and system support, unfavourable currency exchange, and inadequate budgeting, local researchers may be unfairly disadvantaged,” Horn warned.
She said this could lead to the need to cut costs due to tight budgets which can undermine research integrity.
Horn says that without equal partner involvement in research teams, especially in instances where race, ethnicity, gender and culture are involved, interpretations of data can be biased, while research agendas can become flawed and neglect important research questions.
“The dominant perspective of high-income countries’ grant holders can unduly influence research methodologies and analysis,” said Horn.
Rennie Munyayi, manager of postgraduate development at Namibia University of Science and Technology, said in collaborations between African researchers and researchers from higher income countries, African researchers received smaller budget allocations and had limited roles in the projects.
“We need to ask ourselves if these are really research collaborations or merely stakeholder involvement,” Munyayi said, adding that African researchers are also marginalised in decision making processes.
“They are disempowered,” she said.
Munyayi said through enabling local researchers to take the lead in defining research goals, methodology, and implementation, Namibian University of Science and Technology is promoting research integrity.
“Upholding ethical research practices and engagement in social responsibility has been put at the heart of principles guiding research partnerships for the university,” she explained.
Munyayi said researchers in the Namibia University of Science and Technology, have now been equipped with skills, resources and opportunities needed to lead and participate in collaborative research projects.
She called for higher investments in research by global South countries and urged African researchers and research institutions to only enter collaborations that are mutually beneficial to all parties.
“Get into collaborations where you know you will have a voice, preferably join a collaboration before the development of the research agenda and proposal stage,” Munyayi said.
“Collaboration should start even before resources are allocated.”
This article was supported by the Science Granting Councils Initiative, which aims to strengthen the institutional capacities of 18 public science funding agencies in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Related News
News | SGCI Africa News | SGCI News
Wind energy harnessed to solve power shortages in rural Nigeria
Nigerian innovators harness the power of the wind to provide electricity to rural communities. Speed read 1. Nigerian researchers develop a wind energy solution to power rural communities 2. AirVolt’s vertical turbines allow it to produce electricity even in low wind speeds 3. Project aims…
News | SGCI Africa News | SGCI News
Zambian science events seek to boost women’s STEM uptake
Zambian researchers are inspiring women and young people in STEM through science boot camps and mentoring. Speed read 1. Zambia recorded low participation of women and young people in STEM over the years 2. Researchers came up with strategies to inspire young women to enter STEM…
Biogas plant addresses energy poverty in Malawi
Researchers in Malawi are helping communities reduce waste and improve sanitation through biogas production. By: Charles Pensulo [BLANTYRE, MALAWI] A biogas plant in Malawi has transformed the lives of mothers, girls, and children in local communities by reducing reliance on firewood and providing them with…
Research and Resources
SGCI funded projects
Information on projects funded by SGCI coming soon!
Information on projects funded by SGCI coming soon!