SGCI News

Equitable research partnerships lead to better outcomes. By: Gilbert Nakweya [NAIROBI] African scientists are often undervalued and marginalized in collaborative research projects, leading to flawed research questions and biased interpretation of…

Equitable research partnerships lead to better outcomes.

By: Gilbert Nakweya

[NAIROBI] African scientists are often undervalued and marginalized in collaborative research projects, leading to flawed research questions and biased interpretation of data, academic leaders told a panel discussion.

Speaking during a webinar on fair and inclusive partnerships organised by the Southern African Research and Innovation Management Association (SARIMA) on 3 May, they highlighted the power imbalance in research partnerships between scientists in Africa and their counterparts in higher income countries.

SARIMA, a member organisation of research and innovation managers, helps strengthen the capacities of research management for science granting councils in Africa.

“Research grant calls are developed by people in funding agencies in the global North,” says Lyn Horn, director of the office of research integrity, University of Cape Town, South Africa.

“Collaborations and consortia are developed in response to those grant calls and researchers in the global South are merely added because the call requires this.”

She said inequity and unfairness in research partnerships between Africans and their counterparts in higher income countries undermine research integrity.

“Inequity and lack of fairness in research partnerships is a holdup to research integrity,” said Horn.

Rennie Munyayi, manager of postgraduate development at Namibia University of Science and Technology, says African researchers are disempowered. Photo credit: SARIMA Webinar

Research integrity relies on honesty and transparency throughout the entire research process and this requires adequate resources, including financial, human, systems, and infrastructure support, she explained.

“If funding requirements and processes don’t account for the lack of human and system support, unfavourable currency exchange, and inadequate budgeting, local researchers may be unfairly disadvantaged,” Horn warned.

She said this could lead to the need to cut costs due to tight budgets which can undermine research integrity.

Horn says that without equal partner involvement in research teams, especially in instances where race, ethnicity, gender and culture are involved, interpretations of data can be biased, while research agendas can become flawed and neglect important research questions.

“The dominant perspective of high-income countries’ grant holders can unduly influence research methodologies and analysis,” said Horn.

Rennie Munyayi, manager of postgraduate development at Namibia University of Science and Technology, said in collaborations between African researchers and researchers from higher income countries, African researchers received smaller budget allocations and had limited roles in the projects.

“We need to ask ourselves if these are really research collaborations or merely stakeholder involvement,” Munyayi said, adding that African researchers are also marginalised in decision making processes.

“They are disempowered,” she said.

Munyayi said through enabling local researchers to take the lead in defining research goals, methodology, and implementation, Namibian University of Science and Technology is promoting research integrity.

“Upholding ethical research practices and engagement in social responsibility has been put at the heart of principles guiding research partnerships for the university,” she explained.

Munyayi said researchers in the Namibia University of Science and Technology, have now been equipped with skills, resources and opportunities needed to lead and participate in collaborative research projects.

She called for higher investments in research by global South countries and urged African researchers and research institutions to only enter collaborations that are mutually beneficial to all parties.

“Get into collaborations where you know you will have a voice, preferably join a collaboration before the development of the research agenda and proposal stage,” Munyayi said.

“Collaboration should start even before resources are allocated.”

This article was supported by the Science Granting Councils Initiative, which aims to strengthen the institutional capacities of 18 public science funding agencies in Sub-Saharan Africa.





Categories



Related News

Q&A: Partnerships key to collaborating for impactful outcomes

African scientists are trying to elevate their global presence through innovative partnerships. Copyright: Image by Freepik Abraham Mathodi – Acting Deputy Director, Ministry of Communications, Knowledge and Technology, Botswana speaks to SciDev.Net during the 2024 Annual African Science Granting Councils Meeting in Gaborone, Botswana. How can…

Dr._Francis_Omujal_showing_Ugandan_Shea_butter_machine

Uganda shores up shea butter value with time-saving tech

[KAMPALA] For Ojok Okello, a Ugandan shea nut farmer, turning his harvest into a marketable product was a lengthy and labour-intensive process, writes Johnnie Musenze. It would take at least ten hours, with several workers helping him, to process one kilogram of shea butter, a…

Ongoing_construction_of_the_goats_infrastructure_and_mini_milking_parlour_at_Kang_Village_C_in_the_Kgalagadi_area_of_Botswana

Botswana turns to goat milk to fill dairy shortfall

[MAUN, BOTSWANA] Could goat’s milk be the answer to Botswana’s milk shortage? Agricultural scientist Ntshepisa Lebetwa believes it could and has been exploring ways of making it even more nutritious, writes Baboki Kayawe. Botswana’s dairy sector has long been struggling from drought, disease outbreaks, and…